From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-return-211289-listarch-cygwin=sourceware.org@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 30773 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2018 18:35:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Received: (qmail 30764 invoked by uid 89); 9 Feb 2018 18:35:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:35:40 +0000
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE9D40FB634	for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Fri,  9 Feb 2018 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.120.111] (ovpn-120-111.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.111])	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661552026DFD	for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Fri,  9 Feb 2018 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAKrHFwkLF9EpZP+zrw=WRv_QZb3aptn7Cce4o9xDv7-RYBkEdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKrHFwkqiB9WHC8UF3H1FgNM0s7=AhQ0AjmvMPQ8T9_PeqeB1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
Message-ID: <52c5d424-a999-78ce-f69b-8c55c17c6ce7@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:35:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKrHFwkqiB9WHC8UF3H1FgNM0s7=AhQ0AjmvMPQ8T9_PeqeB1g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CmZKT8C4GcTyqOXlqMuOSu1XdnTeieDjs"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2

--CmZKT8C4GcTyqOXlqMuOSu1XdnTeieDjs
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0qw7fJott8R3jGVpOOkMSevzYnk0zvlcM";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <52c5d424-a999-78ce-f69b-8c55c17c6ce7@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions
References: <CAKrHFwkLF9EpZP+zrw=WRv_QZb3aptn7Cce4o9xDv7-RYBkEdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKrHFwkqiB9WHC8UF3H1FgNM0s7=AhQ0AjmvMPQ8T9_PeqeB1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKrHFwkqiB9WHC8UF3H1FgNM0s7=AhQ0AjmvMPQ8T9_PeqeB1g@mail.gmail.com>


--0qw7fJott8R3jGVpOOkMSevzYnk0zvlcM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 485

On 2018-02-08 20:51, Ameya Vikram Singh wrote:
> I tried the latest ViM package(vim-8.0.1428-1).
> Even the current version has the same problem.
>=20
> I do have the **ruby** runtime libraries installed and even the
> development headers package also installed.

Confirmed.  The configure script changed how it was detecting the Ruby
shared library in a way which was unportable to non-ELF platforms.  A
fix will be included in the next release.

Thanks for reporting,

--=20
Yaakov


--0qw7fJott8R3jGVpOOkMSevzYnk0zvlcM--

--CmZKT8C4GcTyqOXlqMuOSu1XdnTeieDjs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
Content-length: 228

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHQEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWn3p+BYceXNlbGtvd2l0
ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+U7FsAnjCtNaIcDV6difzZWr8dNoDysV92
AJ9NAACD1/4l0oOSCthGvRQisjxw0Q==
=66qg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CmZKT8C4GcTyqOXlqMuOSu1XdnTeieDjs--