public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Cygwin gcc-3.3.1 and pragma interface/implementation statements
@ 2003-11-05  5:33 Milton Woods
  2003-11-05 11:40 ` Gerrit P. Haase
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Milton Woods @ 2003-11-05  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Greetings,

When building LyX version 1.3.x from source on Cygwin, I had problems 
during the final link stage where gcc-3.3.1 reported some undefined 
symbols. All of the 'undefined' symbols were actually defined in the LyX 
source code, and the compilation proceeded without errors on Linux. I 
found that the compilation was also successful on Cygwin once the 
#pragma interface/implementation statements were removed from the LyX 
source code. The LyX developers had taken reasonable care to protect the 
#pragma statements from incompatible compilers by using "#ifdef __GNUG__ 
" wrappers, but that did not seem to be good enough.

Does this experience reflect a bug in the gcc toolchain? Or are the LyX 
developers using #pragma statements incorrectly?

Milton Woods.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Cygwin gcc-3.3.1 and pragma interface/implementation statements
  2003-11-05  5:33 Cygwin gcc-3.3.1 and pragma interface/implementation statements Milton Woods
@ 2003-11-05 11:40 ` Gerrit P. Haase
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerrit P. Haase @ 2003-11-05 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Milton Woods; +Cc: cygwin

Hello Milton,

Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 6:34:01 AM, you wrote:

> Greetings,

> When building LyX version 1.3.x from source on Cygwin, I had problems 
> during the final link stage where gcc-3.3.1 reported some undefined 
> symbols. All of the 'undefined' symbols were actually defined in the LyX 
> source code, and the compilation proceeded without errors on Linux. I 
> found that the compilation was also successful on Cygwin once the 
> #pragma interface/implementation statements were removed from the LyX 
> source code. The LyX developers had taken reasonable care to protect the 
> #pragma statements from incompatible compilers by using "#ifdef __GNUG__ 
> " wrappers, but that did not seem to be good enough.

It is a known issue that #pragma interface/implementation doesn't work with
Cygwin g++, no solution/fix is known yet.

> Does this experience reflect a bug in the gcc toolchain? Or are the LyX 
> developers using #pragma statements incorrectly?

No, it is ok with linux.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerrit 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-05 11:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-05  5:33 Cygwin gcc-3.3.1 and pragma interface/implementation statements Milton Woods
2003-11-05 11:40 ` Gerrit P. Haase

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).