From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60169 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 21:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 60158 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2015 21:05:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (HELO smtp.ht-systems.ru) (78.110.50.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:05:11 +0000 Received: from [91.78.178.160] (helo=darkdragon.lan) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) (Authenticated sender: postmaster@rootdir.org) id 1YRS5n-0003l9-9G ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:05:03 +0300 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (HELO daemon2) by daemon2 (Office Mail Server 0.8.12 build 08053101) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:54:28 -0000 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:06:00 -0000 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <532770731.20150227235427@yandex.ru> To: "Habermann, David (D)" , cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] (last?) TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.5 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00925.txt.bz2 Greetings, Habermann, David (D)! >> Since Cygwin 1.7.34, chmod does not always affect the POSIX permission >> mask as returned by stat(2) or printed by ls(1), due to the improved >> POSIX ACL handling. As a temporary workaround, chmod now checks if > I'm a neophyte regarding this ACL handling stuff. Here is my usage model, > which probably isn't that far from the model for many Cygwin users: I use > Cygwin to process/manage files within the c:\cygwin folder structure, and a > very limited number of other folders/files (e.g. /cygdrive/f/backups/...). > I don't require complex security on any of these, and would like to keep things very simple. > 1) Are there any ACL records that might be inherited from windows down into > my structures (I'm in a corporate environment where the corporation "messes" > with many things, so our windows might not be "as out of the box"). There's no ACL inheritance enabled inside Cygwin root by default, so no. To your backups folder, the answer depends on your fstab settings. > 2) How can I detect/eliminate any ACLs within my folder structures of interest? You better don't. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 27.02.2015, <23:53> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple