From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13671 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2014 12:20:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 13657 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2014 12:20:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net Received: from out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net (HELO out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net) (62.24.202.74) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:20:17 +0000 X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkDANJSWlNV0kuo/2dsb2JhbAANTINVgzzBNQMCgSWDGQEBAQMBIxU6BhELGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgBAYg1FaYcdqNMEwSBKYxYXxaCWYFKBK8TgWg X-IPAS-Result: AjkDANJSWlNV0kuo/2dsb2JhbAANTINVgzzBNQMCgSWDGQEBAQMBIxU6BhELGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgBAYg1FaYcdqNMEwSBKYxYXxaCWYFKBK8TgWg Received: from 85-210-75-168.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.67]) ([85.210.75.168]) by out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2014 13:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: <535A52EF.3030108@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:20:00 -0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Coverity Scan References: <5359F391.8060309@tiscali.co.uk> <20140425083500.GA5666@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20140425083500.GA5666@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 On 25/04/14 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> There are some conditions associated with using Coverity Scan [2]. The >> one thing that jumps out is that our relationship with RedHat might be >> a stumbling block. We can but ask - the worst that can happen is that >> they politely decline. > They will. #7 won't fly due to the buyout license clause. Would you like me to enquire anyway? > >> There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move from CVS >> to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should probably >> happen first - I wouldn't want the nugatory effort of getting this >> working from CVS only to have to change it almost immediately. > Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar > with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since > everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt. > Teeth-gnashingly. It might help ease your pain knowing that you can use github with a svn client (to a limited extent): https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple