From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6928 invoked by alias); 4 May 2014 12:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6914 invoked by uid 89); 4 May 2014 12:56:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net Received: from out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net (HELO out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net) (62.24.202.76) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 04 May 2014 12:56:46 +0000 X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAMU3ZlNPRt5d/2dsb2JhbAANTMYEgw+BJYMZAQEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGtXaRxF45ZFoQpBK4dgUA X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAMU3ZlNPRt5d/2dsb2JhbAANTMYEgw+BJYMZAQEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGtXaRxF45ZFoQpBK4dgUA Received: from 79-70-222-93.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.67]) ([79.70.222.93]) by out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 04 May 2014 13:56:42 +0100 Message-ID: <53663901.1010204@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:56:00 -0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-5.18.2-1 (x86) [test] Attn Maintainers with perl reqs References: <5362BD79.7070709@tiscali.co.uk> <87ha5658ix.fsf@Rainer.invalid> In-Reply-To: <87ha5658ix.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On 04/05/14 08:04, Achim Gratz wrote: > David Stacey writes: >> I've built perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.07 for perl-5.18.2 on 32-bit >> Cygwin. Functionally, everything seems OK. However, the performance of >> the test harness was quite poor. With perl-5.14.2, the >> perl-Text-CSV_XS test harness rattled through in 8 seconds; with >> perl-5.18.2 it was 68 seconds (same PC) - that's over 8x slower. Is >> this something you were expecting? > Yes, if you set TEST_VERBOSE=1 you'll see that with the old Perl you've > skipped some 20000 tests with the message "Encode is too old for these > tests", which is no longer the case. Skipping these tests with the new > Perl gets the test times back to where they were, if not slightly > faster. Thanks for explaining - I hadn't spotted that because the number of tests reported was the same for both versions of perl. I'll do some more testing and upload a test version in the next day or so. Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple