From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27038 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 13:19:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 27020 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2014 13:19:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock03.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock03.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.12.34) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 13:19:34 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id s4LDJV0O007067; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:19:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (cpe-67-249-194-47.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.194.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id s4LDJ3qT020688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 May 2014 09:19:19 -0400 Message-ID: <537CA7CC.7080709@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:44:00 -0000 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com CC: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Default manifest References: <5374053E.3080007@cornell.edu> <20140515052547.GA3788@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140515075648.GL2436@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20140515075648.GL2436@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2 On 5/15/2014 3:56 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On May 15 01:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:07:26PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >>> Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests? It >>> looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed >>> something: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01387.html >>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790#c9 >>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807#c8 >>> >>> I'm not trying to rush any maintainers, but I'm asking because I >>> currently have to use a self-built version of binutils, which doesn't >>> provide a default manifest, because of the problem I reported here: >>> >>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00199.html >> >> I'll update binutils ASAP. > > For the default manifest to get going we also need the patcha new GCC > with Nick's patch from > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01378.html > > Is that easily backportable to GCC 4.8, or does 4.8 not support the > %if-exists functionality? JonY, any chance we could get a release of GCC that includes this patch? Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple