From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2804 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2014 13:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 2762 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2014 13:42:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173021pub.verizon.net Received: from vms173021pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173021pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:42:44 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([unknown] [74.104.179.122]) by vms173021.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N7Z00LXCI2DIZ40@vms173021.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:42:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <53B16935.4040201@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:42:00 -0000 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ezmlm problems with yahoo/AT&T senders References: <742648.6649.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-reply-to: <742648.6649.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On 06/30/2014 08:05 AM, tednolan wrote: > I've tried reporting this several different ways, apparently into a > black hole, so I'll try it here on the front list. > I apologize for putting this here, but hopefully someone wil now see it. There are other possibilities for why you haven't received a response to your previous reports. They range from you sent to the wrong address to someone hasn't investigated the report yet. Since this is really a private matter between you, Yahoo, and cygwin-owner and while we appreciate your previous efforts to address this issue directly, engaging the list on this is really off-topic. Also, it may not have been obvious to you but your email to the list on this topic usurped a thread on a totally different subject. We ask that email sent to this list that isn't in response to an existing thread be composed as a new message. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple