From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32570 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2014 18:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 32487 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jul 2014 18:56:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ig0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f178.google.com) (209.85.213.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:56:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uq10so1054840igb.11 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.32.73 with SMTP id g9mr1204067igi.31.1405277792256; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [50.95.64.105] ([50.95.64.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm17443042igu.11.2014.07.13.11.56.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 11:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53C2D65B.5010904@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:56:00 -0000 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com, bill.hoffman@kitware.com Subject: Re: package update for cygwin CMake References: <53C20846.4060103@gmail.com> <53C24BC3.9050202@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: <53C24BC3.9050202@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On 13/07/2014 11:05, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2014-07-12 23:17, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> Bill, >> are you planning to update the cygwin package any time soon ? >> >> Please not that the 32bit is still at >> cmake-2.8.9-2 version >> while last upstream 2.9.x version is 2.9.12. > > IIUC 2.9 was a development branch leading to a stable 3.0 release, so we > don't want that yet. I have 2.8.12.2 in Ports, and AFAIAC those patches > are mandatory for a working cmake. > > > Yaakov > Hi Yaakov, sorry for the typo, I was referring to 2.8.x today we are in the situation that 32 bit has cmake-2.8.9-2 64 bit has cmake-2.8.11.2-1 that was not uploaded by Bill if I remember right and the 64bit version surely need at least one patch, that I am aware of. Bill, I would appreciate to see both version at 2.8.12.2. Could you take care or we should consider the package orphan ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple