From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31329 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2014 15:51:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 31228 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jul 2014 15:51:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173019pub.verizon.net Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173019pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:51:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.231] ([unknown] [74.104.179.122]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N8X00FAW01MMZ30@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for cygwin@cygwin.com; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:51:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <53C9427A.4030104@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:51:00 -0000 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Some programs (vi, ssh) crash when screen buffer height is big References: In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On 07/18/2014 10:48 AM, sous lesquels wrote: >> It's not reproducible for me. I just tried your ssh scenario with a >> 1000 and 2000 line buffers and it works fine for me every time, be it >> with Cygwin 1.7.30 or the latest snapshot. I also raised the number of >> loops. Is it possible that you're suffering a BLODA(*) problem? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Corinna > >> Confirmed. >> >> I tried up to 9999, the maximum allowed. >> >> This is under Windows 8.1 Pro, with Cygwin 1.7.30, both 32- and 64-bit. > > I was running under: > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46 > > It might have been a feature present in 1.7.29. > > More likely, it was a installation issue. I had cygwin1.dll with > 1.7.29 and cygwin1.dll.new with 1.7.30. I ran setup-x86_64.exe > multiple times and it did nothing to upgrade it (I assume it renames > cygwin1.dll.new to cygwin1.dll, correct?). No cywgin processes were > running otherwise. What helped is to manually reinstall "cygwin" > package. Now that I'm at 1.7.30, all seems OK. Probably just a version > mismatch. This is not the recommended way of handling this situation. You end up with a ".new" extension if the DLL was in use at the time of your upgrade. In this case, setup*.exe schedules a replace of your existing DLL with the ".new" version on reboot. So if you find such a file on your system, the sanctioned resolution to this is to reboot. > As a side topic, I did not get a mail with your (Corinna / Warren) > replies, just a digest, and could not reply to it. Not sure how it > will thread. Is there a way to somehow specify which post to reply to > in the body of the mail, so that it threads as I want? As per > https://sourceware.org/lists.html#what-software, ezmlm-idx is used and > as per http://untroubled.org/ezmlm/faq/How-threading-works.html#How-threading-works > it threads by subject, not using In-Reply-To or so. And even if it > did, I cannot specify headers via Gmail (firewall, cannot use other > email clients unfortunately). If not a simple answer, I'll open a > separate thread. You must have subscribed to the list and requested a digest. By default, any email replies to this list go to the list. If you want a direct copy, you have to ask for it and you rely on the kindness of the responder to put in the extra effort to comply. The best way to get individual messages from this list that are easy to reply to is to subscribe without using the digest option. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple