From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13493 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2014 19:09:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 13449 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 19:09:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:09:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6UJ9hhm021738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:09:43 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.65] (ovpn-113-65.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.65]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6UJ9gG4020691 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:09:42 -0400 Message-ID: <53D942F6.10402@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:09:00 -0000 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration? References: <20140730134716.GM25860@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140730184009.GS25860@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: <20140730184009.GS25860@calimero.vinschen.de> OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2 --FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 729 On 07/30/2014 12:40 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one? >>> If so, which one? >> >> How about "@"? >=20 > Dunno. It *might* be a good alternative to '+'. Personally I just > dislike that a '@' is a less "light" character and it might give a wrong > idea. Email: name AT domain. Cygwin account: domain AT name. How bad would it be to treat the window's DOMAIN\user as cygwin user@DOMAIN? Yes, it means string-splicing to rearrange strings when converting between the two forms, rather than just single-character replacement, but it might work. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 539 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJT2UL2AAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq8xgIAIDMYmcUSnuBbJ7fz4RE+9vi N7W1Dc4vDmVkxCMCIMywDtzmhkzSCQu5K8yIHV6rrk19J/vFOrQ811H4Qw4QJUli gO/ui2ejOdEti73ImnOhh5xqvA0971CmccVPb3Ai5TSjGV2oSyiyAwugWtv9P9Nw rlK5CfrkwUF9GZV7XLZYkJO0RS3CmU02AQAZ42EaUkh54WpW3BMzz9b/UP7C6uQm 6SHUl4WUoQI0E+1OaYSmMCzEmhhCSotkLroeil/tYeSeZaHR/386fsVjVsUtBWWm 2ZsVtRM+D8vobSGy4EZhUlfSjsQgkrE+wQAtkatr6fU7UJJhioTif5nHMktgR5A= =Mw67 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN--