Re: Simplify AD integration?

[Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]

On 07/31/2014 07:26 AM, D. Boland wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> So I'd like to ask a few questions to which I'd like to have some brief
>> answers, kind of like a poll, to get a better idea how we should
>> proceed:
>>
>> 1. Shall we remove the leading '+' from the builtin account names
>>    or shall we keep it?
>>
>> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one?
>>    If so, which one?
>>
>> 3. Shall we keep the `db_prefix' variability or choose one of
>>    the prefixing methods and stick to it?  If so, which one, auto,
>>    primary, or always?
> 
> I'm a legacy man. So I would say keep the MS symbol and use it like this \daniel,
> \SYSTEM, etc.

But you'd have to write that as '\daniel' or \\daniel in the shell, and
you also cripple tilde expansion.  That's why we already ruled out :, \,
and / as non-starters, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 539 bytes --]