From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17764 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2014 13:43:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 17753 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2014 13:43:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock04.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock04.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.244) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:43:03 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id s9HDh0XU007192 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:43:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (cpe-67-249-176-226.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id s9HDh06J021880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:43:00 -0400 Message-ID: <54411CE5.8060101@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:43:00 -0000 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: Re: Emacs: ispell fails References: <1413551636.16206.YahooMailNeo@web185404.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1413551636.16206.YahooMailNeo@web185404.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 On 10/17/2014 9:13 AM, Zdzislaw Meglicki wrote: >>>> The question is why aspell thinks the encoding is "nil". > > Ah, indeed. Would the following have set it so: > > (setq default-buffer-file-coding-system 'no-conversion) > > What would be the best (i.e., least intrusive) setting to use here? I would suggest not setting it at all. Emacs is pretty good at figuring out what coding system to use when saving a buffer. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple