From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6463 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2014 19:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6449 invoked by uid 89); 25 Oct 2014 19:24:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-la0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f53.google.com) (209.85.215.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:24:14 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gq15so4061360lab.26 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:24:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.247.43 with SMTP id yb11mr12639201lbc.51.1414265050516; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p5B2997C8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.41.151.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm3177057laf.38.2014.10.25.12.24.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <544BF8BB.4080600@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:24:00 -0000 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Please upgrade irssi (0.8.17) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 On 10/25/2014 8:35 PM, Alive wrote: > Does anyone use irssi on cygwin? > > It seems that irssi package is never upgraded. > > Latest version is 0.8.17. It released on Oct 11 and still no package > upgrade after two weeks (skipping 0.8.16 which is missed a long way ago). > > I don't expect irssi package maintainers to abandon their duty and be > irresponsible after volunteering themselves as package maintainers. cool down, please. "irresponsible" is a strong comment. irssi was not upgraded upstream for years so probably it is not on top of Kostya's list, assuming he has spare time to dedicate and he is still around. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple