From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827153858018 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:55:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 827153858018 Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id jx16so9503417ejb.10 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:55:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B3xnrzfyIX/46jgpz01q9zNx0jwLLa+CBU50//y+RFg=; b=fQRRS1XaiSRTZZD68mLkvW2olvkaWhvWg6+RGHSITF0AOUNH452OLfgRVlHvS1+kUO kA00UhC0+FUIK6hF9Y4M3Ja9rIg3LrHjsux9zzCeqscc8BmHnDL96pGz3gZqcpv6uQMa YXtUJ/eHx4bk7P4S8275yL8F1KU3fI0U5GVMkQiu7bKvrCfvuIIjuLw/hsaHf8TKuWF6 rqVetUen7jh5wa2GdnZme96IY6ibPEqfaDnRZqyX8inGdmMC4Uu3qfRJXWW0RzZjNNsU F2alft21opZfEfr+5QOiKoRYCh/BC1X3JKRkgPFugNCjiqLu+0apnMpsP2APho+D2eIR gGag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jl05G0bdH7OAFDm16cS+XVHiV1LB0CG3m2zWUVE6SOGzA0J3E 7hNZRqZ/OspUEu4wGLhMuE1bSX2vsgZNdQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj+pGdYpvsyHt4APqIyWQp3E1OaMB1NjIBXLmWWaMSYJTgfKwH/sGFEINDWKMXDcFgek9u/w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3094:: with SMTP id 20mr11184811ejv.218.1608461744296; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (p5dda1f06.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.218.31.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm7695986ejc.116.2020.12.20.02.55.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:55:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: New version of GLM package? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= , "cygwin@cygwin.com" References: <952b6ef0-9d45-a53b-90b5-af03b0457c43@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <5522d0a1-aa4c-50d2-4132-18435ef48d00@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:55:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:55:47 -0000 back on the mailing list On 20.12.2020 00:23, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote: > Am 19.12.2020 um 19:21 schrieb Marco Atzeri via Cygwin: > >> for what I can see upstream has completely removed the install >> section from the cmake files on 0.9.9.8 . >> >> unclear why they performed such issue. > > Possibly because there isn't all that much to install for a "library" > that does not actually contain any compiled files, because it consists > of nothing but inlined templates in header files. > > I.e. the binary package would just be a subset of the source in a > different place. > > They seem to assume that the cmake script snippet they offer is > sufficient to make the package count as "installed", because that (with > an environment variable on top) allows the package to be found by CMake > packages.  The canonical method would probably be a CPack package. Hi Hans, I have impression debian is using such assumption and copy just the files in the proper place. It is annoying anyway. The fact that the github repository seems to not have the "issues" is another annoying problem of this package. Regards Marco