From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33926 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2015 10:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 33908 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2015 10:03:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:03:18 +0000 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so40576377wid.0 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 03:03:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr12030171wib.62.1428832995041; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 03:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (pD9E60EFB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.230.14.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mv11sm7569344wic.23.2015.04.12.03.03.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Apr 2015 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <552A42DC.9080703@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:03:00 -0000 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: Re: Libguile17 dependency issue - attention maintainer References: <54E73A20.2020706@lauterbach.com> <54E74A68.2060501@gmail.com> <20150220154232.GY26084@calimero.vinschen.de> <54E7C0F0.8070303@tiscali.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <54E7C0F0.8070303@tiscali.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 On 2/21/2015 12:19 AM, David Stacey wrote: > On 20/02/15 15:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> unfortunately it turns out that our guile (and lilypond) maintainer has >> left us, so the packages are orphaned. Jan's last version of guile was >> 1.8.7-2 for 32 bit. >> >> Does anybody have fun to take over maintainership of guile or lilypond? > > First, let me say that I have no intention of maintaining lilypond - I > am aware that even replying to this e-mail puts me in danger of > acquiring another couple of packages ;-) I absolutely love lilypond and > would like it to stay within Cygwin if at all possible, but I don't have > the time right now to take on a package that is going to be a little > problematic. > > I had a go at building lilypond for x86_64 about 18 months ago, but > didn't get very far. I managed to produce an executable, but 'make doc' > and 'make check' both failed, so I didn't have any confidence in the > binary produced. My need for a working lilypond exceeded the tinkering > time available, so I just used Fedora. > > I've tidied up the cygport file this evening, and this (along with a > small patch) is attached. Hopefully this will be a starting point for a > prospective maintainer with the time to do it justice. > > Dave. Thanks Dave, for the starting point. I used that as base for the 64 bit package just released. Removing the cygwin specific usage of cygwin_conv_to_posix_path / cygwin_conv_path did the work. Make check passed on 64bit, and make doc fails on a corner case, most of the HTML documentation was built. The 32 bit builds but does not works. I suspect there is an additional problem with the underlying dependencies, or we are triggering an existing problem not visible on Linux platform. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple