From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18215 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2015 16:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 18207 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jul 2015 16:17:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net Received: from out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net (HELO out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net) (62.24.202.74) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:17:26 +0000 X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey@tiscali.co.uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AUAgAVcK5V/39e0lUNT4NnvVeBHIYAAwICggYBAQEBAQGFLwEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQG8fJcwAQEIAiCLTIUNFoQVBZFbgniEdYk+lwWBCYEqHIFUgzkBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A2AUAgAVcK5V/39e0lUNT4NnvVeBHIYAAwICggYBAQEBAQGFLwEBBDhAEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQG8fJcwAQEIAiCLTIUNFoQVBZFbgniEdYk+lwWBCYEqHIFUgzkBAQE Received: from 85-210-94-127.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.3]) ([85.210.94.127]) by out.ipsmtp2nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2015 17:16:58 +0100 Subject: Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <201507201914.PAA11490@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> From: David Stacey Message-ID: <55AE7074.7090004@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201507201914.PAA11490@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 On 20/07/15 20:14, Mouse wrote: > The question does not specify a jurisdiction; that XWin is not a > relevant trademark in the USA does not mean it's not elsewhere. (While > I'm not aware of any where it is, I haven't gone looking. I did a quick search, and turned up one trademark of Xwin [1] (note lowercase 'w'). It's in quite a different sphere of business, so there shouldn't be a clash. Dave. [1] - http://romarin.es/marca/xwin/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple