From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54636 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2015 20:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 54627 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2015 20:26:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.lysator.liu.se Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (HELO mail.lysator.liu.se) (130.236.254.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:26:23 +0000 Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B264004C for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.68] (217-210-101-82-no95.business.telia.com [217.210.101.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB5AD4004B for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Updated [test]: coreutils-8.24-2 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <001c01d0e04c$d8ebc210$8ac34630$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <000001d0e051$965f38a0$c31da9e0$@bonhard.uklinux.net> <55DE4B8B.6000401@redhat.com> <55DF6961.9040804@dwalin.fsnet.co.uk> From: Peter Rosin Message-ID: <55DF7265.8050607@lysator.liu.se> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55DF6961.9040804@dwalin.fsnet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00493.txt.bz2 On 2015-08-27 21:47, Sam Edge wrote: > One might add, "Always, always initialize automatic variables. This > ensures deterministic behaviour. The compiler will optimise out the > redundant ones." Seems like a fast way to not get a compiler warning if you do happen to use a variable that would be used uninitialized if it were not for an ugly pointless initializer. Sorry if I added the wrong number of negations in there, but you get my point anyway, hopefully... Cheers, Peter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple