From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 77447 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2015 21:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 77438 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2015 21:03:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:03:43 +0000 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so37149521wic.1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:03:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.86.138 with SMTP id p10mr10279460wiz.39.1441919020715; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (pD9E617C3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.230.23.195]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d17sm17541527wjs.32.2015.09.10.14.03.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Repositories for Cygwin packages. To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <55F1EAA8.5020806@cox.net> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <55F1F026.8080402@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55F1EAA8.5020806@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 On 10/09/2015 22:40, David A Cobb wrote: > I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin > and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com. > > I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are > significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream. > Can you point me to the active repo for coreutils? http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/coreutils.html > > Just to save net traffic, I'll dare post a second related question in > the same message: > Is *NEWLIB* intended to be a "drop-in" replacement for *GNULIB*? No. https://sourceware.org/newlib/ https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/MODULES.html Roughly: Newlib target is to provide a system libc. Gnulib target is to provide a modular library implementation for software that aim on multi-platform builds. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple