From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2519 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 13:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 2500 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2015 13:10:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qg0-f43.google.com Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f43.google.com) (209.85.192.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:10:47 +0000 Received: by qgev79 with SMTP id v79so93525750qge.0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.28.201 with SMTP id 67mr19317226qgz.95.1443791445373; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.112.24] ([12.71.139.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t69sm4614879qki.11.2015.10.02.06.10.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Cygwin-ports-general] Ncview To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56095DBC.6090308@gmail.com> <1443720905.8588.17.camel@cygwin.com> <560DA71F.2060006@gmail.com> <1443776288.8896.3.camel@cygwin.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <560E824D.8040700@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1443776288.8896.3.camel@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On 02/10/2015 10:58, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 23:35 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> >> I don't find any case. > > The XtVa* functions use varargs. > may be. >>> In the case of ncview, I strongly suspect the latter should anyone be >>> interested in fixing this. >> >> The hard issue is that only cygwin 64 bit seems impacted, >> while other 64 platform are fine, >> and that the crash is well deep X libraries during the >> destruction phase of graphical elements >> as the X graphics elements are not correctly destroyed in sequence. >> >> If someone more knowledgeable in X is interested I can provide the >> program and a test case. > > That would be great. > > -- > Yaakov > Hi Yaakov, the program compiled with -O0 is here http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86_64/ncview/ you can also install with setup-x86_64.exe -X -O -s http://matzeri.altervista.org It requires: libnetcdf7 libpng16 libudunits0 libX11_6 libXaw7 libXt6 On http://matzeri.altervista.org/works/ncview/ you can find a small test database (~2Mb) $ ncview s.nc to run it. I also loaded a picture of how to replicate the crash. Until only the first rows of "Var" is selected everything is fine, the data are presented in other windows, while with the second row it usually crashes at the 3rd selection. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple