From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46756 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2015 15:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 46746 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2015 15:38:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock01.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.241) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:38:42 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id t99Fce5S000602 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:38:40 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id t99Fcdim025614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:38:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Problem with nm in binutils-2.25-2 on x86 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5613C8B0.5060604@cornell.edu> <5614EC94.7080500@gmail.com> <561638C5.90503@gmail.com> <561684E7.5010608@cornell.edu> <5617974E.10705@gmail.com> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <5617DF99.7030701@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5617974E.10705@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On 10/9/2015 6:30 AM, JonY wrote: > >> $ nm -l a.exe >> 00406000 b .bssBFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 120. >> 00406018 b .bssBFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 120. >> [...] >> 00406040 b _u.25303BFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 120. >> 00401000 T _WinMainCRTStartup >> /usr/src/debug/cygwin-2.2.1-1/winsup/cygwin/crt0.c:23 >> 004070b8 i fthunkBFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 120. >> 00407074 i hnameBFD: Dwarf Error: Could not find abbrev number 120. >> >> Ken > > Kai is of the opinion that rebuilding the gcc, CRT, Cygwin and > everything in between be rebuilt with the new binutils to solve the issue. > > Might be a huge undertaking. That depends on what you mean by "everything in between". Wouldn't it suffice to rebuild the cygwin package and the toolchain? The main issue for us, AFAICT, is that package maintainers need to be able to build their packages without having the build take hours when cygport calls 'nm -l'. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple