From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120771 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2015 21:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 120634 invoked by uid 89); 15 Oct 2015 21:10:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock01.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.241) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:10:31 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock01.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id t9FLATKv003349; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:10:29 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id t9FLASPq004013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:10:28 -0400 Subject: Re: How to correctly rebase? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <22046.25592.311399.765933@woitok.gmail.com> <8925F252-F479-4990-B568-1EC612DF39A5@etr-usa.com> <22047.42793.36600.773496@woitok.gmail.com> <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7@etr-usa.com> Cc: Rainer.Woitok@Gmail.Com From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <5620164E.1010508@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 On 10/15/2015 4:53 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 15, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: >> >> /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/plain/gustlib/licz/licz-tst.mex: skipped because not rebaseable > > I think these are a harmless confusion of mex-the-Metafont-format with mex-the-Octave-plugin-format. > > You can ignore them. > > It would be nice if rebase were smart enough to look for *.mex and *.oct only in known Octave directories, but it isn’t my itch, so I’m not going to be doing anything about it. > >> The following DLLs couldn't be rebased due to errors: >> /usr/bin/cygintl-8.dll >> /usr/bin/cygiconv-2.dll > > I got similar errors in my testing, though with different libraries. I reinstalled those library packages and the errors went away. Another possibility is that those DLLs were in use. Rainer, did you make sure that no Cygwin processes were running other than dash? > > The only complaints I still see are about a 32-bit libstdc++ for cross-compiling on this 64-bit system, which is harmless. > >> QUESTION: I called "rebaselst" with the "--cleardb" option which should >> cause it to pass "-b 0x70000000" to "rebase" (this is an "i386" system). >> Why then are we starting above at a base of 0x32b40000? > > Because BLODA? No, it's because rebase is called with the -s option, which implies the -d option, which means that it starts at 0x70000000 and works down. Rainer, you can run 'rebase -is' to see the full list of base addresses. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple