From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15901 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2015 15:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 15866 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2015 15:29:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock02.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock02.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.242) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:29:34 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id t9GFTWKu006597; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:29:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id t9GFTUcl026231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:29:31 -0400 Subject: Re: How to correctly rebase? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <22046.25592.311399.765933@woitok.gmail.com> <8925F252-F479-4990-B568-1EC612DF39A5@etr-usa.com> <22047.42793.36600.773496@woitok.gmail.com> <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7@etr-usa.com> <5620164E.1010508@cornell.edu> <22048.47638.206600.117271@woitok.gmail.com> <5620F460.7020605@cornell.edu> <562112CE.4040407@cornell.edu> <562114AF.7040704@gmail.com> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <562117DB.7010900@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <562114AF.7040704@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On 10/16/2015 11:15 AM, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/16/2015 11:07 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >> I've seen this happen many times. I don't know the explanation, but my >> guess is that Windows does some caching that causes it to try to load a >> given DLL at the same base address as it used the last time that DLL was >> loaded. Rebooting clears the cache. Can someone who understands this >> stuff confirm my guess or provide a better explanation? > > Could it be something similar to > http://windowsitpro.com/systems-management/how-can-i-stop-windows-caching-dll-file-after-i-close-program-was-accessing-it? That article only talks about shell-extension DLLs, but it does sound similar. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple