From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22910 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2015 12:45:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 22859 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2015 12:45:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock04.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock04.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.244) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:45:05 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock04.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id t9ICj0xm012019; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:45:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpe-67-249-176-138.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.176.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id t9ICiwtT024830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:44:59 -0400 Subject: Re: How to correctly rebase? To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Rainer.Woitok@gmail.com References: <22046.25592.311399.765933@woitok.gmail.com> <8925F252-F479-4990-B568-1EC612DF39A5@etr-usa.com> <22047.42793.36600.773496@woitok.gmail.com> <41C9E795-AEEC-4378-8548-44DAF7DB98E7@etr-usa.com> <5620164E.1010508@cornell.edu> <22048.47638.206600.117271@woitok.gmail.com> <5620F460.7020605@cornell.edu> <562112CE.4040407@cornell.edu> <22051.32540.675000.621396@woitok.gmail.com> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <5623944A.3090809@cornell.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22051.32540.675000.621396@woitok.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 On 10/18/2015 7:14 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > Ken and Others, > > On Friday, 2015-10-16 11:07:58 -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > >> On 10/16/2015 8:58 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >> ... >>> As Warren and Achim have both suggested, you may just have too many DLLs for >>> 32-bit Cygwin. > > Just to make sure: Are we talking about Windows and Windows application > DLLs PLUS Cygwin and Cygwin application DLLs? Or are we just talking > about Cygwin and Cygwin application DLLs? Just Cygwin and Cygwin application DLLs. >>> Can you uninstall some unneeded packages? > > I'm sure I can. In the course of using Cygwin I've installed plenty of > packages and have also uninstalled some again. And each package in- > stalled has also installed all the packages it depends on, while each > package deinstalled has naturally left all its dependees on my system. > > Question: is there some command line tool which lists all dependencies > for a given package? I could then write a small shell script to find > out the list of packages which are not required by any other package. > And if I then find packages in this list which I don't require, too, > I've found some candidates ... Install the cygcheck-dep package and use the script /usr/bin/cygcheck-dep. >>> Or switch to 64-bit >>> Cygwin? > > Well, it's a bit strange: the hardware in fact IS 64 bit, but the Vista > running on it is 32 bit, because this laptop is a convertible and some > of the tablet specific drivers, for instance for the stylus, were (at > least five years ago) only available as 32 bit versions. So the quest- > ion is: what does 64 bit Cygwin require? Only any Windows on a 64 bit > hardware or a 64 bit Windows on a 64 bit hardware? I suspect it's the > latter ... Yes, I think so. >>> By the way, I don't think you have yet attached cygcheck output as requested in >>> http://cygwin.com/problems.html: > > You are right. That was mainly because my initial problem wasn't of the > kind "What's wrong with my Cygwin installation?" but rather of the kind > "What's wrong with my way to rebase my Cygwin DLLs?". I've appended the > output below, and I really hope you're right, and somebody will spot > something there ... In the future, please follow the instructions, which say to send the cygcheck output as an *attachment*. This is to avoid bogus hits when people search the archives. The only things that jump out at me are the ZoneAlarm warning (which you already know about) and the fact that you do indeed have a large number of packages installed. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple