From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16454 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2016 03:06:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 16412 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2016 03:06:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:56A5244, viewing X-HELO: limerock03.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock03.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.243) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:06:28 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite3.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.8]) by limerock03.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id u0P36Q5p018144 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:06:26 -0500 Received: from [10.13.22.4] (65-112-130-194.dia.static.qwest.net [65.112.130.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id u0P36PxC001107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:06:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56A52443.7030809@cornell.edu> <20160124225744.GC27138@calimero.vinschen.de> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <56A59132.600@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160124225744.GC27138@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 On 1/24/2016 5:57 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Does it fail to create ACLs? Do the created ACLs make sense? If you > have a file created with Cygwin >= 2.4.0 and change the file content > with Emacs, does the ACL change or stay the same? Stuff like that. I've tested everything I can think of (including emacs's functions for viewing and changing ACLs), and it all seems to work fine. I can provide more details if you want. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple