From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27853 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2016 14:39:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 27835 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2016 14:39:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:cornell.edu, fil, Fil, kbrown X-HELO: limerock02.mail.cornell.edu Received: from limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (HELO limerock02.mail.cornell.edu) (128.84.13.242) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:39:05 +0000 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite4.serverfarm.cornell.edu [10.16.197.9]) by limerock02.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4_cu) with ESMTP id u14Ed33w024768 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:39:03 -0500 Received: from [10.13.22.4] (65-112-130-194.dia.static.qwest.net [65.112.130.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id u14Ed2Cw004449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:39:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Updated: emacs-24.5-3 (TEST) To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56A40D09.1010606@cornell.edu> <56AB7439.7060803@cornell.edu> <56AB82F8.1060904@cornell.edu> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <56B36287.7030002@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On 2/3/2016 4:40 PM, Daniel Daboul wrote: > Ken Brown cornell.edu> writes: >> Actually, completion seems to work for me if I use forward slashes but >> not if I use backslashes. Can you confirm that? If not, please show me >> a case where it fails. > > Yes, you are right. > > c:/Program Fil[tab] > > is actually completed. I didn't notice that because > I tried backslashes. I think that's good enough for me, > although the mingw version I mentioned handles either. Thanks. At some point I may look into making completion work with backslashes, but it's not a high priority for me. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple