From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68600 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2016 19:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 68587 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2016 19:24:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*Ad:U*yselkowitz X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:24:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2988E3F2 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.37] (ovpn-116-37.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.37]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u18JOo17026555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:24:51 -0500 Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20160208131835.GC12975@calimero.vinschen.de> <20160208141015.GD12975@calimero.vinschen.de> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <56B8EB73.8090900@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160208141015.GD12975@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 On 2016-02-08 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Alternatively we could allow to use the Solaris ACL functions even if > only including sys/acl.h, given some macro: > > sys/acl.h: > > #ifdef __USE_OLD_SOLARIS_ACL_FUNCTIONS > # include > #else > [...POSIX definitions...] > #endif Do the functions or typedefs conflict in any way? -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple