From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19875 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2016 21:43:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 19864 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2016 21:43:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, mcjit, time-consuming, OOTB X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:43:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5A9E1B6E for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.17] (ovpn-116-17.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.17]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1ELhbf3001749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:43:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Assorted MinGW-w64 toolchain libraries and tools To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56BBDCBE.2050208@cygwin.com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <56C0F508.5080104@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BBDCBE.2050208@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 On 2016-02-10 18:58, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> (Also a newer clang+llvm would be useful, they've made a lot of >> improvements since 3.5.) > > LLVM/Clang version bumps are time-consuming to get right. I actually > looked at 3.6, but MCJIT did not work OOTB with PE/COFF targets. I'll > have to see what the story is with 3.7. FWIW, I have 3.7.1 ready pending a stable gcc 5.3.0 release. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple