From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8862 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2016 16:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 8116 invoked by uid 89); 16 Feb 2016 16:05:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, cygwinports, HCc:D*fr, Hx-languages-length:706 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:05:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F7013595; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.17] (ovpn-116-17.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.17]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1GG5lxv028485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:05:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ocaml-4.02.3-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1346370388.3887272.1451928885262.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <56AADC6C.8010208@cygwin.com> Cc: damien.doligez@inria.fr From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <56C348DB.6070600@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56AADC6C.8010208@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00247.txt.bz2 On 2016-01-28 21:28, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-01-05 06:48, Damien Doligez wrote: >>> There is now a flexdll for x86_64. Could you please enable >>> (nat)dynlink there too? >> >> I'd missed this piece of news. The upstream flexdll page doesn't >> mention cygwin-64 as a supported toolchain. Did you do the porting >> yourself? >> >> Anyway, I will prepare a new version of the package with dynlink >> enabled for cygwin-64. > > Ping? Damien, While you're at it, I noticed that libasmrun_shared needs a fix similar to libcamlrun_shared. I posted the fixed patch here: https://github.com/cygwinports/ocaml Could you provide a 4.02.3-2 soon? -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple