From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97886 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2016 10:18:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 97853 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2016 10:18:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:loom.20, marcoatzeri, UD:atzeri, UD:marco.atzeri X-HELO: mail-qg0-f44.google.com Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f44.google.com) (209.85.192.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:18:02 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id t4so94067457qge.0 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:18:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U0zXH9vYuoqHdVLg4IrEIHKb1zMB5Pj3UXxU8gokTcg=; b=nOKTyiLLQXyaGGm8fLWveNviTa5zXqZGZHs+BlGgmxHDypRrmeWOrBta8RsCqUOKI7 L+XdfVOzYyV5Jvtn25cBB/lTRw6SKXXPdVoRfDDTt6couJFaQDg4j0wouP+ibNklRuHl ZeNjhXtLJdfNBp1IHGzCFJbZz9aJ4SFKttmnu8lDTtRaD//KulOJ8J4qrn5sGCtfasi1 qXckDsHBvc7FTlHDO82y8DdvLaRZi8ny6Ajy9w/kteUaiyAdwggZFgaxnuIE5T7QnOWP 5gj1yH1OqDyI3eVl6QkAZhyNu2CJqRY/csVhl5jRM47EEaCUAAylFO8yEpg1Ih9ZTWrL 1aMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLYsYrBBxf5lV7fOukis9hexxw2mPAzNa5hnknE68e24zN7tU8TzspeEKb2n0e34w== X-Received: by 10.140.28.54 with SMTP id 51mr10320483qgy.36.1457691480748; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.106.108] ([24.97.227.121]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm3627372qgd.49.2016.03.11.02.17.59 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 02:18:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: rebase segfaults on ocaml-base To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56E288E7.80102@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <56E29B52.8030206@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 On 11/03/2016 10:45, Achim Gratz wrote: > Marco Atzeri gmail.com> writes: >> rebase segfault on >> /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllunix.so >> >> As this cripple the full rebaseall setup, it should be worth >> to check if it is a rebase weakness (*) or if dllunix.so is an incorrect >> binary. > > Well, rebase shouldn't segfault anyway. Do you know where it crashes? > > > Regards, > Achim. > as there is no rebase-debuginfo ... no -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple