From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 89884 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2016 22:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 89837 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2016 22:14:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:a0c2329, H*f:sk:a0c2329, claims X-HELO: mail-wm0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f53.google.com) (74.125.82.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:14:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id p65so34629546wmp.1 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:14:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BwKU1scIuElZoLk+lmaJSjU2gRLFlVxndtrAxMnA1FY=; b=VngNcgZWsJaIiTYXIpUzWQuPQL8aJAHEBjanIffreKZZLlAVRt4cbg576YUOoBG7ER Tam7E+7+1C5ML4sIjP0fTGOAtBSNagaLu6wl11LZPfN6t7yown8paPsVpmVuPzfRZoYN aqxZMCyU9zUkNf8tQvUo9Yhk/EU6LzFFt3ZDpvhSPmwEX3lFs0htTBBhva6y4o1JBKqy qQT+Tfagm3EnM1Hks8qh41iQ69Gs9e87Rz21zSEqVfayF25npcq+wrfCwQEgS0rk/gFr FCo79kYHXRI5HmJYhWKfBsP9zwXdtjZOZfdodagRRwrxO54dOQ0j9Qzd+6hUNtNuxyA0 Zatg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK9MeQ6O82MLP9wJnGbf511bk9J4P8chL+UJQJmqc91trYaDgczIh+JOx4pNyln8Q== X-Received: by 10.194.187.71 with SMTP id fq7mr11527491wjc.97.1457734475909; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:14:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p5B174C17.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.23.76.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e14sm4190615wmi.21.2016.03.11.14.14.34 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:14:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Problem with line buffering and getc function on 1.7.33. To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <56E34346.9010000@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 On 11/03/2016 22:57, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 11.03.2016 12:08, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2016-03-11 13:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote: >> >>> On a Cygwin installation version 1.7.33-2(0.280/5/3), I encountered >>> an odd issue. >> >> This is a 15-month old release which is no longer supported. Please >> update to 2.4.1. > > Do you mean, "Please update to 2.4.1, it is fixed there!" > or do you mean "You haven't done enough with that minimal > C repro case; please keep investigating against > the latest code?" #2 please verify if the issue is still present in the last code. We don't have the bandwith to check claims on older release. on 2.4.1 the output is: $ ./test_stream.exe received REQUEST from client received from server > There is no benefit to me in reporting this issue > at all, since the workaround is acceptable and will > likely keep working indefinitely. the scope should be to benefit others with the same problem... Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple