public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EA86C2.9080600@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20160317T090346-49@post.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 883 bytes --]

On 3/17/2016 16:07, Tony Kelman wrote:
> Tony Kelman <tony <at> kelman.net> writes:
> 
>>
>>> I have just updated the mingw-w64 headers, runtime, and winpthreads to
>>> 4.0.5-1.
>>>
>>> mingw64-*-headers-4.0.5-1
>>> mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.5-1
>>> mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.5-1
>>
>> Question, since I just had issues building some of LLVM's unit tests and
>> tracked the root cause back to here - is it intentional that x86_64-headers
>> gets built with --enable-secure-api but i686-headers doesn't?
> 
> Week later, hopefully socially acceptable ping. Can I request that
> mingw64-i686-headers get rebuilt with --enable-secure-api at the next
> update? Is there an especially good reason not to have it enabled by
> default?
> 

Sorry, I didn't notice your email. No, its an oversight, a new v4.x
update will be coming soon, it should have this fixed.





[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-17 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 10:23 [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1 (x86/x86_64) JonY
2016-03-09  7:31 ` Tony Kelman
2016-03-17  8:07   ` mingw64-*-{headers,runtime,winpthreads}-4.0.5-1(x86/x86_64) Tony Kelman
2016-03-17 10:28     ` JonY [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56EA86C2.9080600@gmail.com \
    --to=10walls@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).