From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82012 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2016 21:29:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 81943 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2016 21:29:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:504, H*i:sk:56EB1D2, H*MI:sk:56EB1D2, H*f:sk:56EB1D2 X-HELO: mail-wm0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:29:30 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l68so10168303wml.0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:29:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=piQu/cZLZdiMLVc8DZVlU9QM805QdIMC9ZnXzUYK8MY=; b=Cs6Q+dVQa4DNviue88Krue05vD1lME2WyDQU5JFoNB5dQGL2zZ6TFZFLqfJqj2aSTE dJeFb4r4nuw3yzn657WULdpX6k9SzD8aF8KA92H7EmOPZMW1WWJTrYx54RzCHIdoDss1 ktPPF7jeDKvmMWz4yRE3BMcQKGpadRZoQW80XFxqQ3DIuOjL97USF+/y5zeM/Vc7ROMP WV54oy+G8gGdBM0QuLcaphEvz73xyniCwNZW3bjYIW/MVdSWlGUAA4LxZ1BBRonlEDaO /f9Nz/hclXY8yoBESuenEdzaRR565u53P2GUMi2ExZLNtrOmVePy899WFsrcynHCdfKT MQHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLZws+TdpNaRIKYCwKcEEPtpNvcJNNr0wogCwt1PibD8oa1JxVBmf0Q275q5TSV5A== X-Received: by 10.194.185.237 with SMTP id ff13mr13418552wjc.129.1458250166886; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.108] (p5B174C17.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.23.76.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm9898380wms.1.2016.03.17.14.29.25 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ctrl-c doesn't reliably kill ping To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <56E6F25A.7070000@gmx.de> <56E75B3E.7020102@farance.com> <54382838.20160315140038@yandex.ru> <9ee672500661e37c240d30d8413ca0af@mail.kylheku.com> <56E972EB.9000204@gmail.com> <56EB1D2B.4090103@farance.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <56EB219E.1050604@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 21:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56EB1D2B.4090103@farance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On 17/03/2016 22:10, Frank Farance wrote: > Folks- > > > Anyway, as we'd say in standardizing the C programming language, this > behavior is a "surprise" ... and we should look to eliminate "surprises". > > Again, thank you in advance for your help. > > -FF > > as mentioned on: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-03/msg00312.html can you send me a strace to see where the program is stacking ? No promise to find a solution but I will look on it. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple