From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24806 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2016 18:37:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 24792 invoked by uid 89); 14 Apr 2016 18:37:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Greetings, Moss!, moss!, *Linux* X-HELO: csmail.cs.umass.edu Received: from mdc1.cs.umass.edu (HELO csmail.cs.umass.edu) (128.119.240.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:37:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.25.193] (eduroamgw.cs.umass.edu [128.119.40.194]) by csmail.cs.umass.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 807FF480000CE98446; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:37:21 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: moss@cs.umass.edu Subject: Re: native Linux userland in Windows 10 References: <70rpgbh81o3fkrdgh8ldh2hmon25ihnr1s@4ax.com> <570CF112.6060405@gmail.com> <20160412134132.GP9870@calimero.vinschen.de> <570D4AFB.4000906@cs.umass.edu> <6103A4A6-C242-4D4E-AA1E-7774BFB66D96@etr-usa.com> <1273817198.20160413182530@yandex.ru> <570FB27B.2050600@asokolov.org> <570FD4D2.608@cs.umass.edu> <1653026972.20160414213014@yandex.ru> To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Eliot Moss Message-ID: <570FE35C.9050707@cs.umass.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1653026972.20160414213014@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 On 4/14/2016 2:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Eliot Moss! > >> On 4/14/2016 11:08 AM, Alexey Sokolov wrote: > >>> Unrelated: If they just implement Linux kernel interface, I don't see >>> why other distros can't work. > >> Can't system call numbers, etc., be totally different >> between different kernels? > > Different as Linux vs. BSD vs. ...whatever? Yes, that can be. > But differences between different *Linux* kernels? Ah, I take your point. Regards -- EM -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple