From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2992 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2016 19:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 2978 invoked by uid 89); 26 Apr 2016 19:19:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Console, H*UA:38.2.0, H*r:212.227.17, H*r:sk:mout.ku X-HELO: mout.kundenserver.de Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (HELO mout.kundenserver.de) (212.227.17.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:19:06 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.44] ([95.91.244.106]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXprj-1bFDgv2xq3-00WpbE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:19:02 +0200 Subject: Re: Mintty font problem To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <014uDkmQD5520S08.1460378583@web08.cms.usa.net> <570C0BC0.6070205@towo.net> <570D5A16.7050303@towo.net> From: Thomas Wolff Message-ID: <571FBF27.9070906@towo.net> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <570D5A16.7050303@towo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:VD2zgMLK6NM=:KDChAuudC8d+ByHOJGeEH1 4W2n+ch1PvH4T6BmCOk3yVmM1AcnbhE/lF3Zo7ky9AJ359PwHf3azwWIlpeLSZ2KWfaRWjOPF ffrljHDalJw1xWes1okQmktweG1ylu4JY+3sQanO8vwlpG6OteksGao+FlkP3YfuH8lYKYatd hKJ3i4YLKNEyjleJe3bj9VzTRkAB3vf+YUhmm9ILZ0AUGA0t6SuaBrArzDVTIPfmSPXQpQn/2 X3SaRkeUnJ15OvoHoRl9FfaPwdJ64Aqst7RFUixOoVeEa54mi2QFtkU6UpntYW54Lh5utC4HD EuI6x+xDl8owFviSKM47jm8SpwKkcWdGWVRrNuGihhsJIO3ovuwOfVGn2gsK0VKtqnIbq5bU3 u03Zz26WZgfDufkKX31iJtt8FAJMyWccYrYNbKsGVUSadDLtttiVxKy7nWxMZHkPYP18IAx/4 hDAJIJJvBw4Q39LmzePzxDFO2AV/QJE2tIwbi35Ny5YticM6L90Tcok62XKKLaEM8R3LEs185 bzW5EkfJLsn5BXGoI4yvdm3p9lCSF/U9vciDbXVW8q5ozqIz8NFdXntPy1u0TTtK0SPQa2mYE 5pfyL85QKiLRbc7ZcX3cNSkyX4UiULV6UP9bjoB6G5XcHhwc6Q/Na0F+cnnVBBIGMnWfVD/Bw d6E0towRnt7cKjTvouuCVR5XyfvrYu59BBTZudJ9eNW96A+stiSKPB0X/iCpv4Ix78iM5lodl Sgbka8jv2eewA38I X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00608.txt.bz2 Am 12.04.2016 um 22:27 schrieb Thomas Wolff: > Am 11.04.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Thomas Wolff: >> Am 11.04.2016 um 14:43 schrieb KARL BOTTS: >>> >>> Perhaps related to font issues in mintty: In .minttyrc is a new >>> property >>> FontWeight=700, >> which means you had configured the bold version of the font. >>> after I installed Cygwin 2.4.1-1 and mintty 2.3.5. (I noticed, >>> only because I have home dir files in revision control.) I too use >>> Lucida Console. >>> With the 700, the font looked visibly "skinny" to me. >> actually, rather the normal, non-bold font. The new font weight >> adjustment apparently enforces that although you selected bold >> (unless an even bolder weight would exist in the font family). >> Maybe the font selection should be tweaked to allow selecting a bold >> font even at the cost of not having a bolder variant available. > Actually, it does allow that, as can be seen with some other fonts. > The issue with Lucida Console is that it does not have a bold weight, > so there is only the Normal (400) weight which is then selected by the > new font weight tweaking algorithm. > >>> I set it to 800, looks fine now. No problem, just tinkering required. > This is obviously inconsistent with the behaviour of mapping 700 to > Normal. This has been tweaked in the repository. Thomas -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple