From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17045 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2017 05:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 17037 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jan 2017 05:02:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, charged, larry, Larry X-HELO: mail-qt0-f194.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f194.google.com) (209.85.216.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 05:02:41 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id f4so289985qte.2 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:02:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:reply-to:references:to:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ap1m8QN3np8Tk6+BYwai8sDy5dLRSLrG+s+WeXbM7Hc=; b=Zv5WdClnTXTLLje6epj7M8NFGfjr8oVjiyZsABabDvEhwNyApZoz+s6ZmZ4/Xk8UtX Tzan0wpF59ACaNTI9GvGU9Zg3zgqrsD50EvVfYdrzC5cFC5rStVWZZRt1Lhlf60cubFB udrD+Kj16cBgUyHB+aMOF6OwLa1LsvnkerS4+FiV9r5RJ4jJI9ECbJznSUuoiZYN3TwG JQ5xXbPFItxXH620Cb/bIxJu30SH5Pyf+cYMP1fja0rzxtYNp4BBKV4UxZMMWiZcL0TW avkm+X8e/nPCUfakTUq0BptooBD4AXOmSRtWsIGEWaxt5/o5KryEJNrcDTrjnpHTi4uI 9bfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXISO0I7dWJFZIYvSNHoEHrMoGLmfbjFnMZh/1fbgBO52BbVtiUXXNBHqKKuUC37vA== X-Received: by 10.200.48.206 with SMTP id w14mr1320941qta.50.1484715759583; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.230] (pool-173-76-164-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.76.164.160]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k20sm20579770qkl.11.2017.01.17.21.02.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:02:38 -0800 (PST) From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libreadline7-7.0.1-1, libreadline-devel-7.0.1-1, bash-4.4.5-1 Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <22d8cd67-3a5a-9f7f-9e4a-eb0a43bd5b2c@redhat.com> <587ee723.e1039d0a.48332.ec2d@mx.google.com> To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <587EF6ED.6010008@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 05:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 On 01/17/2017 11:09 PM, Doug Henderson wrote: > On 17 January 2017 at 20:55, Steven Penny wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:08:17, Eric Blake wrote: >>> [again, your email client likes to break threading, so I nearly missed >>> this one] >> >> Sorry about that, I wrote my own client so that I could reply without >> subscribing: > > I find it despicable that you want us to participating in solving a > problem you encountered, but seem unwilling to subscribe so you can > participate in solving problems that the rest of us encounter. > > I feel that you are using false pretenses to use our time to think > about your problem and offer solutions, if we can, without > reciprocating. > > Shame on you. Whoa! While I agree there has been some very negatively charged comments coming from Steven in this thread, I don't think we need to start finding fault with everything he says and does relative to it. It's perfectly fine for him, or anyone else for that matter, to monitor a thread or this list in whatever form works for them. In this case, Steven corrected the problem when it was pointed out to him that his method was breaking threading. That's a perfectly acceptable response and all we can ask of him in that regard. There's no need to go looking for fault in that. Let's try to keep this thread productive and moving forward. While I would say, in my estimation, it got off to a rocky start, I think the recent exchange between Steven and Eric has done allot to track the problem and to scale back the negative comments. Let's try to keep the thread moving forward on both fronts. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple