From: Mark Geisert <mark@maxrnd.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: long I/O delays when strace is running
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 09:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58FDA29D.7080908@maxrnd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00fb01d0-acdc-68da-e31e-45ffa7099043@pobox.com>
Daniel Santos wrote:
> Well, waiting for GNU/Linux tests to run, so I had a little more time to play
> with this.
>
> On 04/23/2017 02:42 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>> Daniel Santos wrote:
>>> Well thank you, I wish I had read this earlier. I've been trying to debug (with
>>> gdb) strace (following children) and now I know why the debugger is blowing
>>> through breakpoints, because I may be debugging strace, but strace debugging
>>> it's own child. I added a _pinfo::dump () member function that I'm calling from
>>> pinfo::init () after the test "if (!created && !(flag & PID_NEW))" and it's
>>> crashing because for some processes, the entire _pinfo struct isn't mapped in,
>>> just the first page. Of course, I'm a newbie in this sphere, so maybe I've
>>> missed something and there's sometimes a reason for this? (The first part of
>>> the struct looks normal.) Otherwise, that would be another odd flaw.
>>
>> I don't know enough about pinfo.h and pinfo.cc to say anything definite on this.
>
> Well here's one mystery solved. I modified my dump() function to first dump the
> first page of the struct and then the second, so that when it crashes I can see
> the contents of the first page at least:
>
> _pinfo 0x30000 {
> pid 2044,
> process_state 0x00004001,
> ppid 2044,
> exitcode 0
> cygstarted 0,
> dwProcessId 0x00000000,
> progname "",
>
> The process_state's bit 0x00004000 happens to be PID_EXECED, so this is
> intentionally shorter because there's no more information.
>
> As for the strange _pinfo object that causes the delay, this appears to be an
> error in the process database because the windows PID is a duplicate of another
> process entry. (I modified ps.exe to output the _pinfo::process_state field.)
>
> $ strace --trace-children --output=/tmp/ps.log --mask=all ps -el
> PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME STATE COMMAND
> 948 1788 948 1772 pty0 197608 00:04:22 000000c1
> /usr/bin/bash
> 2720 1 2720 2720 ? 18 00:02:42 00000041
> /usr/bin/cygrunsrv
> 860 0 0 860 pty0 0 00:04:30 00000001
> /usr/bin/cygrunsrv
> 984 1 2168 984 pty0 197608 00:04:30 00000041
> /usr/bin/ps
> 2376 1628 2376 2612 ? 197610 00:02:45 000000c1
> /usr/sbin/sshd
> 2524 2720 2524 1404 ? 18 00:02:42 000000c1
> /usr/sbin/cygserver
> 2168 948 2168 860 pty0 197608 00:04:30 00000061
> /usr/bin/strace
> 1788 2376 1788 2788 ? 197610 00:04:22 000000c1
> /usr/sbin/sshd
> 1628 1 1628 1628 ? 197610 00:02:45 00000041
> /usr/bin/cygrunsrv
>
> The entry that causes the delay is the one with a zero PPID and PGID and the
> progname field is wrong -- It isn't "cygrunsrv". It always has the same
> progname name of the previous process. Notice that the WINPID field has the
> same value as the PID of the strace process that's real (2168).
>
> So my guess is that this object shouldn't even be there.
Excellent debugging work! I'm inclined to agree with your last point. I'm
poring over pinfo.cc as well as dcrt0.cc, which is the Cygwin DLL init code.
The latter talks about special cases if the DLL is runtime loaded (like strace
does) vs link-time loaded (like Cygwin apps do). May take me a while to respond.
..mark
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 18:13 Daniel Santos
2017-04-21 0:11 ` Gluszczak, Glenn
2017-04-21 7:57 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-21 9:38 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-21 11:06 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-21 12:08 ` Mark Geisert
2017-04-21 18:23 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-22 15:24 ` Mark Geisert
2017-04-23 12:58 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-23 18:15 ` Mark Geisert
2017-04-24 8:23 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-24 9:24 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-24 9:34 ` Mark Geisert [this message]
2017-04-24 15:00 ` Daniel Santos
2017-04-24 19:30 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58FDA29D.7080908@maxrnd.com \
--to=mark@maxrnd.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).