From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124723 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2017 11:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 124709 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2017 11:47:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=ANNOUNCEMENT, H*UA:github.com, H*M:google X-HELO: mail-oi0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f42.google.com) (209.85.218.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:47:29 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id g125so2189360oib.12 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 04:47:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:to:subject:references :user-agent; bh=li9AtKT1bZyoTxj29/jlTIGGOzHFrl/+EcXoInkS8/g=; b=qeoKdiIaYKGQGauRUt/oLHVEIo8v2t8HFMTFW4WKTU/o2GznhBXZi0c90OHS046fto 8BN52JEmbW31s/OT1pMbP8TGtE3a6RVtsJdaqBqbJd7ZrTNrO+sa+1n1z46cBOp4atkT YZQ3cg3V/t7Qe7fdT+npt7W+6OJDUOHK9yWCUDXZ65hFGwCubPeBaaNZ2aG863f3o+bp 8spKRvhc1JT7LQhuSzlzPQU4yRcZGimw+qmeLkTn0EC+B4GlmyTROddgXUjmN3M2g4Mk wPbm8fz4yzAiS6j23vn57HZFAjZ0dqhuVJwzfLJA3YDWNsWAx/L8AN0ajbmAEnprcgrs ne0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWUqvpx0OIMgSHHX/w6uGPtOgZzxLZsuhbFyoS1WUa8vIzOArWV kccoT73qMDgrRdjI/sD2wAeZuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TUn6XY6lLEHzkMzH8DtyYRSDkO3vb4tjODnr+dx25X4rmqfLO+spr1IkGUkSenOPNqnxmc8w== X-Received: by 10.202.83.23 with SMTP id h23mr6488157oib.395.1508240848001; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 04:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gzW ([2605:6000:9fc0:56:3c14:e5c4:5a0e:92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e124sm4048379oia.30.2017.10.17.04.47.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 04:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <59e5edce.8237ca0a.705b2.909e@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:47:00 -0000 From: Steven Penny X-Google-Original-From: Steven Penny To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [Updated] mingw64-{i686,x86_64} binutils, gcc (Test) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8; format=flowed User-Agent: Tryst/2.0.1 (github.com/svnpenn/tryst) X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 14:16:07, JonY wrote: > The mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated: > > * mingw64-i686-binutils-2.28.1.12c1f20d > * mingw64-i686-gcc-6.3.0-1 > * mingw64-x86_64-binutils-2.28.1.12c1f20d > * mingw64-x86_64-gcc-6.3.0-1 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-08/msg00182.html Can mingw64-{x86_64,i686}-gcc move to Current? These were released about 2 months ago, and it seems the only issue was with binutils, which has already been fixed and moved to current. Please and thank you. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple