From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121429 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2016 15:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 121414 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2016 15:36:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=houder, xs4allnl, xs4all.nl, H*f:sk:d62c155 X-HELO: lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (HELO lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net) (194.109.24.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:36:32 +0000 Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.214]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id 8fcU1s00j4d84Ai01fcU9M; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:36:28 +0100 Received: from a83-162-234-136.adsl.xs4all.nl ([83.162.234.136]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:36:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:01:00 -0000 From: Houder To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygpath 2.4.0 (32-bits) in error? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5b7c7b9221dd0ba0414898de02a22e72@xs4all.nl> X-Sender: houder@xs4all.nl (ma4S+9wAJnbqHJIbMrlANQ==) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On 2016-01-21 16:11, Achim Gratz wrote: > Houder xs4all.nl> writes: >> %% uname -a >> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW Seven 2.4.0(0.293/5/3) 2016-01-15 16:14 i686 Cygwin >> >> %% /usr/bin/cygpath -S -u >> /drv/c/Windows/SysWOW64 <==== Nice, the truth is out! ... but do we >> want >> it here? >> %% /usr/bin/cygpath -S -w >> C:\Windows\system32 >> %% >> %% /usr/bin/cygpath -S -U >> /proc/cygdrive/c/Windows/SysWOW64 <==== ditto > > Well > > /usr/bin/cygpath -u $( /usr/bin/cygpath -Sw ) > > delivers the right result. I guess an option to chose which result to > get > might be nice, but I can cope either way. ... :-) But I was only pointing out a difference between 2.3.1 and 2.4.0 ... (and I even did not bring up SysNative this time ;-) Regards, Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple