From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from m0.truegem.net (m0.truegem.net [69.55.228.47]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B422A3858C39 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 03:20:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B422A3858C39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=maxrnd.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=maxrnd.com Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id 17P3Kexo063768 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 162-235-43-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(162.235.43.67), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpdH4rGT3; Tue Aug 24 20:20:38 2021 Subject: Re: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled? Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <41A583E1-C8E7-42AB-9F24-EEC33A41EC60@house.org> From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: <5e374368-81da-58da-04fc-9131a98871fb@maxrnd.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:20:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, MISSING_HEADERS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 03:20:44 -0000 NightStrike via Cygwin wrote: > Older versions of windows had a setting to optimize the OS for either > background services or foreground applications. One of the things this did > was throttle network usage. I don't know if windows 10 has the same setting > though. Yes, it does. Getting to it is a pain. Search the "Settings" thingy for "Advanced system settings". That will bring up the System Properties dialog you used to be able to get to from the Control Panel. Click the Advanced tab. Under Performance, click Settings... . Click the Advanced tab there. Right in that dialog there's a Processor Scheduling box where you select for best performance of "Programs" or "Background services". It would be interesting to hear what it's currently set to before you try changing it. Try to keep all your testcases the same so we're dealing with apples to apples. ..mark