RE: where is at at?

[Larry Hall <cygwin-lh@cygwin.com>]

At 01:50 PM 5/21/2004, you wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cygwin-owner  On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
>> Sent: 21 May 2004 18:10
>
>> On Fri, 21 May 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> 
>> > Dave Korn wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes, there's also a Posix AT command:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/at.html
>> > >
>> > > It interacts with the cron daemon. So in principle 
>> there's no reason
>> > > why there shouldn't be a cygwin at command to interact 
>> with the cygwin
>> > > crond entirely independently of the 'doze at command and task
>> > > scheduler. I guess nobody's ported it yet.
>> >
>> > Let us know when you are finished porting it! ;-)
>> 
>> :-) "Have I phrased it sufficiently neutrally to avoid being 
>> asked for a
>> patch?" (C) Randall R. Schulz
>
>  If it's now getting so that even *answering* a question rather than asking
>one makes you liable for sending a patch, I think it's starting to get
>_really_ mean around here!


True.  Please submit a patch with your intended changes. ;-)



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/