From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "McCunney, Dennis" To: "'cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com'" Subject: RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 11:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <65CAA822B707D211AD430008C7F40FED748439@EXCHANGERSW2> X-SW-Source: 1999-08/msg00289.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Faylor [ mailto:cgf@cygnus.com ] > Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 1:10 PM > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Horak Daniel; 'pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org'; > 'cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com'; 'Joost Kraaijeveld' > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) > > We don't have correct emulation of IPC semapahores since they are not > implemented at all. I assume that if you're relying on persistent > semaphores, then some add-on package is being used. > > cgf How about an additional section in the API FAQ with a list of stuff that _isn't_ implemented, together with a note for each on whether it isn't implemented because you haven't needed to, and if anyone does, please send a patch, or it isn't implemented because you don't think it _can_ be done in the Win32 environment, and if anyone figures out a way, please send a patch? That info is there, but it might be convenient to have it all in one place. ______ Dennis -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "McCunney, Dennis" To: "'cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com'" Subject: RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 23:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <65CAA822B707D211AD430008C7F40FED748439@EXCHANGERSW2> X-SW-Source: 1999-08n/msg00289.html Message-ID: <19990831234900.taq9opdywDAECjv82CRoKGMX9Rjmjc5EvBzWUdX_IFc@z> > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Faylor [ mailto:cgf@cygnus.com ] > Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 1:10 PM > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Horak Daniel; 'pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org'; > 'cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com'; 'Joost Kraaijeveld' > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) > > We don't have correct emulation of IPC semapahores since they are not > implemented at all. I assume that if you're relying on persistent > semaphores, then some add-on package is being used. > > cgf How about an additional section in the API FAQ with a list of stuff that _isn't_ implemented, together with a note for each on whether it isn't implemented because you haven't needed to, and if anyone does, please send a patch, or it isn't implemented because you don't think it _can_ be done in the Win32 environment, and if anyone figures out a way, please send a patch? That info is there, but it might be convenient to have it all in one place. ______ Dennis -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com