public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: falk.tannhauser@free.fr
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Inefficient use of 64-bit addresses in Clang
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <732305300.268416262.1565603129541.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436640898.268382790.1565602671940.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net>

References: <578eb489-9391-9009-82ad-676eeb4c1c92@agner.org>
In-Reply-To: <578eb489-9391-9009-82ad-676eeb4c1c92@agner.org>

Could the different behaviour between Cygwin and Linux simply be due to different Clang versions?
The current version under Cygwin is 5.0.1, while the latest version available under Linux
appears to be 8.0.1 .

Falk

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

       reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1436640898.268382790.1565602671940.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net>
2019-08-12  9:45 ` falk.tannhauser [this message]
2019-08-14  5:51   ` Agner Fog
2019-08-16  6:06     ` Clang is using the wrong memory model Agner Fog
2019-08-16  8:25       ` Mark Geisert
2019-08-16  8:26       ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-16  9:27         ` Agner Fog
2019-08-16  9:52           ` Agner Fog
2019-08-16 10:39           ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-16 10:50             ` Agner Fog
2019-08-16 11:25               ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-16 13:28                 ` Kai Tietz
2019-08-17  6:59                 ` Agner Fog
2019-08-17  9:48                   ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-18 11:37                     ` Agner Fog
2019-08-18 11:58                       ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-18 18:14                         ` Agner Fog
2019-08-19  8:58                           ` Corinna Vinschen
2019-08-06 12:30 Inefficient use of 64-bit addresses in Clang Agner Fog
2019-08-12  9:20 ` Mark Geisert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=732305300.268416262.1565603129541.JavaMail.root@zimbra54-e10.priv.proxad.net \
    --to=falk.tannhauser@free.fr \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).