From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113281 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2018 19:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 113272 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jul 2018 19:03:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FOREIGN_BODY,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=E-Mail, EMail, Canada, canada X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (HELO smtp-out-no.shaw.ca) (64.59.134.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 19:03:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([24.64.240.204]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id ePpHfWutcp5A1ePpIfCrx1; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:03:28 -0600 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca Subject: Re: Fork issue on W10 WOW To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7ad0e0d4-438b-33ad-a711-e0b1996fa6f6@gmail.com> <20180709090332.GC3111@calimero.vinschen.de> <87e94b8c-13d0-928e-957d-c32b15b8a962@gmail.com> <20180709123739.GB27673@calimero.vinschen.de> <20180712133847.GT27673@calimero.vinschen.de> <874lh17txr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87zhyt66o4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <7bdb2eb7-8612-0c4d-b79c-767efb58b31a@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 02:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87zhyt66o4.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 On 2018-07-14 11:58, Achim Gratz wrote: > Marco Atzeri writes: > Anyway, the only time I've seen similar behaviour was when some other > library was occupying the address space the systems libraries should > have occupied, and the they get some extremely random address assigned > until the next reboot. To do this the other library must however be > loaded pretty early in the boot process. If you wrote the mail on said > laptop, this >> Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft. > might be an explanation for the whole thing. AVG is well known for > intercepting things already during boot and loading a bunch of their > libraries early. Some of it is still done even if you switch it off > completely and some changes to the registry might even survive a > deinstallation. +1 for AVG BLODA - had to deinstall that years ago, and was slow; only reason I still run an AV is to catch stuff, either in Windows binaries from download sources about which little info is publicly available, or in email which folks I trust forward once in a blue moon, from their greedy or gullible infected friends, who are in the main, clueless or in denial about it. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple