From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F0B3858D28 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 07:12:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 43F0B3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id i22so63793227wrb.13 for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 23:12:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:cc:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Y5nlE27xoUXPU40y/CVqp6YLubM1+CTZ0csDb41yW0=; b=YAkNWWTqqzLPA61MqXmSGXhuhOxLyZfXUOo9yF6cz85W/KyLDmirl++X6ZtHN2OZYE KEAujP3bpQYnFXrqpYq61aV25aGmoCv0rjpLnHHRr/cf967mzU1LmQTbya3Pa3bPewiO VHd5hJrU0lnj06ltfDKhskHjfpHYHAAwmZFB1cWcNMtTSGy/d82xvjxTl2X1Fm/mUXN9 xnVoytGtHyqJfoMlg09S/n62Rfcyjo0QxnAI4WA7KY8WgUHtxK1RRvEoSvhrkCIkMppy yeII39fXUFWM7uXbYPVJTLXytFupAxat7ntwVwYaQzVBNCY6Rzzcc0A5ytZHHwRQK2O8 LZ0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:cc:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Y5nlE27xoUXPU40y/CVqp6YLubM1+CTZ0csDb41yW0=; b=wPJaMOB/1x7mWYcxWQpwpy1s6OHwLs0ZEOFrFO/muNEdBpjqc8QUh4qrBB1/jqxQMU xdGUF7CS1p/84txvq0HRgZnPMImxA50Guyd2P1ffvmEWFjt54GnEoLEhsibUGzRDCW98 zv8msaWarJeoRvRaOHhkd7bqhUL/kc+EhMPtjn8XDh1W5NqExIH7Yyv073w+xjmdgPcZ nJ1kUgbrH3Kj1pe4FlY57zJacfx81xvcjyVH4hOlrtFpzAlMhAJ2kpBoU7QHN9+4ndPS mHt+z/x+rrG6yOos47jGjgX1FveQlS5X+RAPOtlsuBiXn5UYshJXozH98qEWfsBQohrf inCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dkPV4EKvqLkjfkucJ8ODRlNjf7OJstiOoJQPmF5zexlymP7KT plAVdMmT61NcGfbT3gXDuvGw/uUH3ls= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIztrhyydsNRdKO5beCW1drxJ5XIqh/mfSaIKcEOPP6xyMaZmDyi4utQc6bgxc9p7+T5Xtow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:184f:: with SMTP id c15mr35023540wri.73.1641107536404; Sat, 01 Jan 2022 23:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.121] (pd9ed532a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.237.83.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm31631717wru.48.2022.01.01.23.12.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Jan 2022 23:12:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7d2f0b81-0bbf-d147-fe5c-678978e2921c@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 08:12:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: Follow-up to: vboxsharedfs - Too many levels of symbolic links Content-Language: it To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" References: <25040.56638.44943.834427@consult.pretender> <2d5959c2-e9a8-bff8-0bf0-533e4787c669@gmail.com> <25041.20371.400483.42141@consult.pretender> From: Marco Atzeri In-Reply-To: <25041.20371.400483.42141@consult.pretender> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 07:12:18 -0000 back on mailing list, please reply always there On 02.01.2022 08:09, cygwin@kosowsky.org wrote: > Thanks. It works! Nice to know > Marco Atzeri wrote at about 00:33:29 +0100 on Sunday, January 2, 2022: > > On 02.01.2022 00:01, cygwin@kosowsky.org wrote: > > > Hi, > > > About a month ago, a thread with the above title mentioned that a > > > patch to the problem was submitted. > > > > > > I am encountering the same problem on my Cygwin/Win10/Vbox 6.1.30 > > > installation. > > > > > > Any idea when that patch will be pushed to production? > > > Or barring that, is there a test version that I could download > > > somewhere as this bug is somewhat limiting for me at this point... > > > > > > > Snapshots are here: > > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > Regards Marco