From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outgoing-yousee-5.gl-mut-gbl.as8677.net (outgoing-yousee-5.gl-mut-gbl.as8677.net [193.201.76.65]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F53538708F8 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:58:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4F53538708F8 Received: from filter.yousee.as8677.net (localhost [94.147.60.30]) by mwumf0307.yousee.as8677.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4BXv5T2KCkz18VRkH for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [94.147.60.30]) by mwumf0307.yousee.as8677.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4BXv5T1s5fz18VRjK for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [94.147.60.30]) (Authenticated sender: donpedro@tdcadsl.dk) by mwumf0307.yousee.as8677.net (SMTP Server) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <808225108db9bd9b485a4a177ee0e146b45a93d9.camel@tdcadsl.dk> Subject: Re: Synchronization problem with posix_spawn From: Peter Dons Tychsen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200820125011.GR3272@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <864b3031-9fc8-beb3-ba7c-1ade4c31a288@cornell.edu> <20200730115913.GL4206@calimero.vinschen.de> <20200730171723.GA460314@calimero.vinschen.de> <86051625-646d-065a-8543-1c3086411d3d@cornell.edu> <20200731081025.GB460314@calimero.vinschen.de> <9c44f4351d459a2ba8d27c65bf71679208cb13d6.camel@tdcadsl.dk> <20200803105004.GK460314@calimero.vinschen.de> <1ae8de15bb74efb7207299d2dba92cdef88d9a94.camel@tdcadsl.dk> <20200820125011.GR3272@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4 (3.36.4-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-yse-mailing: LEGIT X-yse-spamcause: OK, (0)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudduuddguddufecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfvffevpdggtfgfpffufgeuufevtffkuefgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkffuhffvffgjfhgtfggggfesthejredttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgvrhcuffhonhhsucfvhigthhhsvghnuceoughonhhpvggurhhosehtuggtrggushhlrdgukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdeigfegueduveekvdegfeeufeeihfegledvkeevieeiheffiedtkeeuiedtjeffnecukfhppeelgedrudegjedriedtrdeftdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtrdhlohgtrghlughomhgrihhnpdhinhgvthepleegrddugeejrdeitddrfedtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepughonhhpvggurhhosehtuggtrggushhlrdgukhdprhgtphhtthhopegthihgfihinhestgihghifihhnrdgtohhm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:58:08 -0000 Hi Corinna, On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 14:50 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > No, it won't work as expected, as you can see from the discussion in > > this thread. Some internal work would be required. OK. So even with no file actions and spawn atributes, it still would break things. What kind of things would not work? Could you share a few thoughts on what would be needed? Just to get an idea of the workload it would imply. Thanks, /pedro