From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121016 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2016 14:40:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 121007 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2016 14:40:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Stromeko, stromeko, UD:DE, NexGoDE X-HELO: mail-wm0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:39:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 127so10251750wmz.0 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:39:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a8nTliIbXN/vvtTfZjy9I64uA3qrsvBhtLix1aY64WI=; b=CcefwMCWS7U+adH+3RwHRU3tv5x5040OpulTPIf2iV8ptF+ZYAYZlb0BEc6wa2ys9L IiQTIV2GlRe6PCaSjvhcDSvOzqPzuIdb8xQGn8yQ93Wu0GtFDdBehJsRJvx9VQoOnSD4 fsTQ4qW8Trtj5yXYu59HdQvUaADScLJNkay7+q9nN9YND3tiGh7Poq7SE1dgl4RqtaWo 0aWVBWiMn5IB0x6CgZSxXWOi58e2OyXhmZ6UElLDzoRidJL84yIKNFzdcWHtYYgITtoB APirNQ75XXVA4qqljM/hD0FNXdp1SkU7bHr/2yUGvpbz6admoRWcBJnGAlRAzcfKAUjF 44UA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUpPA69mRdtkPui5M38qxAL3ZUaTXR6ZuYlB6oBF5dmOPsXFTtuDNanJR18XxHgVA== X-Received: by 10.195.11.197 with SMTP id ek5mr20669073wjd.58.1461335991951; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.21.188.188] ([149.6.156.42]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o128sm3686044wmb.19.2016.04.22.07.39.50 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 07:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Process map and fork problems To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20160420104633.GA26118@calimero.vinschen.de> <0f14ddb1-4cbf-e421-df2f-b700896ece29@gmail.com> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <813a6f20-7014-965a-04ab-ec1c950ea0b1@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 On 22/04/2016 15:23, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz NexGo.DE> writes: >> Static data? The bss segment is taking up much space... > > Yup, the F77 parts apparently use COMMON arrays "the sizes are chosen > generously for normal purposes". Ugh. > > > Regards, > Achim. > > I opened a ticket upstream https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?47761 As it is reusing a third library I do not expect a fast correction. I will report also on netcdf the same issue. Thanks Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple