From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12347 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2014 18:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 12239 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2014 18:30:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:30:13 +0000 Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube7.xs4all.net [194.109.20.205]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3OIU9cc069399 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from waterlan@xs4all.nl) Received: from waterlander.xs4all.nl ([83.160.52.146]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:30:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:30:00 -0000 From: waterlan To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygwin needs a man-db port In-Reply-To: <5357D9AE.6060807@breisch.org> References: <5241EF7D.9080309@xs4all.nl> <52433E7A.4070600@xs4all.nl> <524341E5.6080601@xs4all.nl> <5322EA04.3040008@xs4all.nl> <53501E4E.7080103@breisch.org> <5357D9AE.6060807@breisch.org> Message-ID: <8149fda0a7a38274bc0e23ff09b4b1ea@xs4all.nl> X-Sender: waterlan@xs4all.nl (+/uRDuWIx26wkAESZ+wztefE7m+WFyCV) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00547.txt.bz2 Chris J. Breisch schreef op 2014-04-23 17:18: > Chris J. Breisch wrote: >> >> Check-0.9.12 seems to work out-of-the-box. Configure with >> --prefix=/usr. >> >> "make check" on check reports all tests passed, despite what appear to >> be some failures. The CHANGELOG says that this version should pass all >> tests on Cygwin. I've just subscribed to the mailing list and will >> check >> on whether these failures can be ignored or not. Still, it definitely >> appears to work better than the version we have now, which only passes >> 1 >> test in the test suite. > > Just to follow-up on this a bit more. > > I misunderstood the results from check's check. I should learn just to > trust the summary results. The tests passed. >> >> Libpipeline-1.3.0 seems to work out-of-the-box. Configure with >> --prefix=/usr. >> >> Oddly a "make check" for libpipeline-1.3.0 doesn't appear to actually >> do >> anything. This was not the case for earlier versions of libpipeline. >> Well, that's one way of getting rid of the test failures, I guess. >> > > I must have done something wrong in the build before I sent this. > Re-building libpipeline does cause 'make check' to execute the tests. > I got one failure. I've talked to the owner of the project, and he's > sent me a patch that does eliminate the failure. So I now have a > libpipeline where all tests pass under Cygwin. Hi Chris, Would you like to send the patch to me? > I still get the shared library warnings when building man-db. I > haven't yet investigated that. regards, -- Erwin Waterlander http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple