From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43484 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2020 05:09:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 43476 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2020 05:09:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=utillinux, util-linux, dear, Dear X-HELO: m0.truegem.net Received: from m0.truegem.net (HELO m0.truegem.net) (69.55.228.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 05:09:35 +0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by m0.truegem.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id 02459Yvw026382 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 21:09:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@maxrnd.com) Received: from 162-235-43-67.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net(162.235.43.67), claiming to be "[192.168.1.100]" via SMTP by m0.truegem.net, id smtpdr7BMcF; Tue Mar 3 21:09:33 2020 Subject: Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f@cs.umass.edu> From: Mark Geisert Message-ID: <85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9@maxrnd.com> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f@cs.umass.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00066.txt Eliot Moss wrote: > > Dear cygwin-ers -- > > Something I had asked about a while ago was the absence os taskset in cygwin's > util-linux.  At the time, it was pointed out that the necessary get/set > affinity library/system calls were not yet supported.  These were added a > while ago, so it would seem that taskset ought to work.  In fact, I think > someone got it going on their own.  Can we add it to util-linux now, > officially?  I think this was intended but perhaps was overlooked or > something. Report noted; thanks. A solution is being worked. ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple