From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74073 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2020 06:41:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 74066 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2020 06:41:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=DLL, german, German, HX-Languages-Length:878 X-HELO: mail-wr1-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f49.google.com) (209.85.221.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:41:48 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t2so14637822wrr.1 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:41:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RExlWLRui7n2HM8BcwWh4N2sZNCfWlCsGKB9NC1Z1SE=; b=MGg7ezn4R7KHH1Htzza6ZYPrllrUtWDqAQ5PNugVwf9w5hvFLiRWLcj1Sd76mF1nSx dzdEscPgBChihMD809NFEBTzSc37ubToUKTvRqh5ODt/hQQVJ78ilSYHeOP8eEgDr0zt dsjbWsBpxt1MeV3x1g2SPlUtwhyVJrNmPJ0BGOSzDtFSfkZ5oqMCZsh/W6mm9LbiWOk3 5+uptE1mTKwsoGG8onjtsaGIFG8pxU9oUcwvu5Y+aJSHG2OfILiCJuMPYuXzn0dBK7SV EW7hVcBx+YZMlqNWo4Jqf4ANG2DIeu9ZWpcakpYEjImmIazw9TqIW42GD/msdJEfzoq5 bF0g== Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ee:6727:2e01:8c72:acfb:b33b:6833? (p200300EE67272E018C72ACFBB33B6833.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ee:6727:2e01:8c72:acfb:b33b:6833]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4sm272250wro.69.2020.01.27.22.41.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:41:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <2904b4fa-6349-bd3e-c4ff-4b32a0bb3838@gmail.com> <87y2tvs278.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> <08ac898e-e7f9-c8e9-91ba-d4ee33f2e27c@gmail.com> <0fb5712c-7d57-d5cb-56b7-3a0d2f44d8a2@gmail.com> <20200127203346.1c8e3657d7283e3aa2c617d8@nifty.ne.jp> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <85ddac25-0b4a-5e01-7885-0d2855c37a45@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200127203346.1c8e3657d7283e3aa2c617d8@nifty.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100 > Marco Atzeri wrote: >> Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on >> possible difference that could influence the build behaviour. > > Attached. > Thanks Takashi, I duplicated your installation from scratch on my W10 Home and it fails again in the same place. So I am now almost sure that the recent MS updates changed/broke something in W10 Home. :-(( Assuming it does not break German systems and left immune Japanese ones :-? I will try to install the same in a W10 Pro and if that does not segfault I can try the lengthy process to compare the object/dll/exec files to see where is the difference. Corinna, there are specific code differences in Cygwin DLL between W10 Home and Pro ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple