From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 723E1385C309 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:27:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 723E1385C309 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id q6so4136810qtn.4 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:27:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=resent-to:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id:from:newsgroups :cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:cancel-lock:mime-version :posted-to; bh=SY19g2S2qAHeofK1vnoujMwWbwq6ECIVwLJOcQlsy7k=; b=KFJDImOmFBWw136GH2A9QXXVk1fCTHCHCSABN+U06OZT/BpcCchicnKxhVizJ5phTk xMkC8zXni1NygjkfgCy/GQbOVooGxEgp9wUTVPh8l5JEX/vhxXsANXv7i3h/csFFKTCG i4Zrot+OlLARxMcZGUci066SiT4dIcBcnwe4pC2c1pICuFm8GGdd+fhuLjL+Od5haqkX hEcC0WL+AoLTi5FdKRTXHBvWgcaD8k+eFfMRclt79n4Z3I8vqXFkWNymSJS6Pdz2tRud fF9dWC+7uhRz4UNxMhWw9rqJRfHLmpt9GbGD8OtuwtXVqZIDjySyxTNLpdcRqmwY1oTK aEag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:resent-to:resent-from:resent-date :resent-message-id:from:newsgroups:cc:subject:date:message-id :user-agent:cancel-lock:mime-version:posted-to; bh=SY19g2S2qAHeofK1vnoujMwWbwq6ECIVwLJOcQlsy7k=; b=G713NT8bRq51Mdbnn6ti5g4DsiqI/ip2JqaoxE2xB5aCqSLW9l23HNzl2IuZasZmgN oBm1EJE4dwKGcWWYk3YtRqZooApLs9w9AZZqpPFSLcFG5C/XN0oGaDJTdWIUi90WfJKu sLKvP+dprIAwWIgOsUPZKz/Rw/l8rE0ROYN4lZ4THsO6ApTkG80hm1B1YNtZvpb2YYee 2X+k5oFxWo90C5qxCB2NLvK/NKR6gVhICOmDQSc35ajTQg5dEFmqs8k4WeVHctQR9yGa FeRQTET3WGkQHGc4tQuJQVdRuSceRBgc7hWz8qEEO9KA0l69xykcYR17kUEPECA8R46c u8qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533c1mhU++DYVX3awaZkdD8fdxWVIdnRCgm+u+wvZgouI7JIvELV VxAh6V8cQbaOCUOGdGSV2uZqZOBnc0pl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGbKQJqESFGu+Wli7ombwQZtKkTNHuacWJFsb1d2EGiVBSG6yJMEqFnC5Xl7hnylwn9GoPjg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7498:0:b0:2ed:c85:c9e1 with SMTP id v24-20020ac87498000000b002ed0c85c9e1mr9327670qtq.258.1649636836259; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DESKTOP-5JD7O8D (pool-100-11-154-238.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [100.11.154.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm1-20020a05620a198100b0047bf910892bsm19840953qkb.65.2022.04.10.17.27.15 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Resent-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Resent-From: Samuel Bronson Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 20:26:15 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <87a6cs4g9k.fsf@DESKTOP-5JD7O8D.localdomain> From: Samuel Bronson Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Cc: Achim Gratz , Yaakov Selkowitz Subject: License for clang patch "7.0.1-cygwin-driver.patch" Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:22:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87lewf43na.fsf@DESKTOP-5JD7O8D.localdomain> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mKZhw5aGV7/R2xzCcAnjCr8+UOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Posted-To: gmane.os.cygwin X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:27:19 -0000 The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.os.cygwin as well. I was thinking of trying to upstream the patch at: --text follows this line-- https://cygwin.com/git-cygwin-packages/?p=git/cygwin-packages/clang.git;a=blob;f=7.0.1-cygwin-driver.patch;h=8f2419846f3d649b81282868d8cd94de574a50f8;hb=e1fccf772aa5add40bba9050abeea188c62acbdd But I expect the LLVM people would want to make sure that the changes are licensed appropriately. Unfortunately, I couldn't find anything about the licensing of the packaging files in that packaging repository, nor do I see anything about a licensing policy for packaging files on the page . It doesn't exactly help that the LLVM project are in the midst of relicensing their code, and the new policy only landed after the 8.x branch, so even a "same as upstream code unless otherwise specified" policy would only really help W.R.T. Achim Gratz's update of the patch from clang 8.x to clang 9.x. The current licensing policy for LLVM is described at: Any ideas about this?